Analisis Pengaruh Work-Life Balance terhadap Quiet Quitting pada Generasi Z melalui Mediasi Psychological Safety dan Work Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v6i6.9728Keywords:
Work-Life Balance, Psychological Safety, Work Engagement, Quiet Quitting, Generation ZAbstract
Berhenti secara diam-diam telah muncul sebagai pola perilaku yang meluas di antara karyawan Generasi Z, yang semakin memprioritaskan kesejahteraan pribadi, batasan kerja yang jelas, dan keamanan psikologis di tempat kerja. Studi ini menyelidiki pengaruh Work-Life Balance terhadap Quiet Quitting melalui peran mediasi Psychological Safety dan Work Engagement. Pendekatan penjelasan kuantitatif digunakan, melibatkan 405 karyawan Generasi Z di Indonesia yang dipilih melalui purposive sampling. Data dianalisis menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM–PLS) dengan SmartPLS 4.0. Temuan ini mengungkapkan bahwa Work-Life Balance me~miliki efek positif dan signifikan terhadap Psychological Safety. Psychological Safety juga berdampak positif pada Work Engagement, sementara Psychological Safety dan Work Engagement menunjukkan efek negatif dan signifikan terhadap Quiet Quitting. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa keamanan psikologis dan engagement bertindak sebagai faktor pelindung yang mengurangi kecenderungan karyawan untuk menarik diri secara pasif. Lebih lanjut, Work-Life Balance secara tidak langsung menurunkan Quiet Quitting melalui mekanisme mediasi Psychological Safety dan Work Engagement. Secara keseluruhan, studi ini menggarisbawahi peran sentral keseimbangan kerja-kehidupan, keamanan psikologis, dan keterikatan dalam membentuk perilaku kerja modern di kalangan Generasi Z. Hasil studi ini memberikan kontribusi teoretis bagi literatur perilaku organisasi kontemporer dan implikasi praktis bagi organisasi yang berupaya meningkatkan kesejahteraan dan mengurangi disengagement.
References
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
Byrne, Z. S. (2005). Fairness reduces the negative effects of organizational politics on turnover intentions, citizenship behavior and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2), 175–200.
Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 709–729.
De-la-Calle-Durán, M. C., & Rodríguez-Sánche~z, J. L. (2023). Quiet quitting and the future of work: Understanding employee disengagement in digital environments. Employee Relations, 45(2), 456–472.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23–43.
Fitzsimmons, T. W., Yates, M. S., & Callan, V. J. (2022). Gen Z in the workplace: Expectations, motivations and challenges. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(1), 23–40.
Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165.
Gallup. (2023). State of the global workplace report 2023. Gallup Press.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. Journal of Management, 37(1), 10–45.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Jain, A. K., & Saini, R. (2023). Quiet quitting: A conceptual analysis of employee withdrawal in modern workplaces. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 10(1), 45–62.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
Kanten, P., & Sadullah, O. (2012). An empirical research on relationship quality of work life and work engagement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 360–366.
Li, H., & Shang, Y. (2020). Psychological safety and engagement among young employees: The moderating role of leadership openness. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 35(4), 271–290.
Liu, Y., Ma, X., & Wu, J. (2024). Minimum-effort behaviors and quiet quitting among Generation Z employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(2), 367–389.
Park, S., Johnson, K. R., & Park, S. (2020). Work-life balance, role overload, and psychological safety among employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(2), 87–102.
Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 6(1), 19–38.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
Twenge, J. M. (2023). Generational differences in work attitudes and expectations after the pandemic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(3), 427–445.
Wagner, J., & Grimm, S. (2023). Evaluating model fit in PLS-SEM: Guidelines and empirical insights. Structural Equation Modeling Journal, 30(2), 125–144.
Template
