The Impact of Virtual Laboratories on Student Motivation and Academic Performance: An Integrated Fuzzy-Sem and Machine Learning Study

Authors

  • Tabriz Osmanli Department of Artificial Intelligence Technologies, National Aviation Academy, Baku

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v7i1.9146

Keywords:

virtual laboratories, fuzzy-SEM, machine learning, motivation, academic performance, Engagement, Predictive Analytics, E-learning

Abstract

This study explored the impact of virtual laboratories (VLs) on university learning and seeks to fill a gap in the literature: most VL research reports positive outcomes, but rarely explains why they occur or whether psychological mechanisms generalize predictively. The solution comes from a synthetic model combining Fuzzy-SEM, which is great for modelling uncertainty within Likert-based motivation and engagement constructs, with supervised machine learning models that provide causal explanation combined with predictive validation. We analyzed data from 432 undergraduates combining VL usage logs, motivation–engagement surveys, and official academic records. Fuzzy-SEM confirmed a mediated motivation–engagement–performance pathway, which confirms that VLs significantly boost performance primarily by converting motivational activation to sustained engagement. Predictively, the 1D CNN better fitted the classical ML models (AUC-ROC = 0.94) suggesting the possibility of early identification of at-risk students through behavioural and affective proxies. Practical implications should be to apply VLs as complementary motivational approaches to training practice and to monitor prediction weekly for intervention. In theory, the study bolsters engagement frameworks by elucidating how VLs exert their effect. Methodologically, it presents an integrated Fuzzy-SEM + ML pipeline that facilitates both explanatory context and potentially deployable prediction, although it recognizes the limitation of single-institution and self-report.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdel-Hamid, O., Mohamed, A., Jiang, H., Deng, L., Penn, G., & Yu, D. (2014). Convolutional neural networks for speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 22(10), 1533–1545. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2014.2339736

Akbulut, Y. (2025). Beyond self-reports: Addressing bias and improving data quality in educational research. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 16(2), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1630477

Al-Alawi, L., Al Shaqsi, J., Tarhini, A., & Al-Busaidi, A. S. (2023). Using machine learning to predict factors affecting academic performance: the case of college students on academic probation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12407–12432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11700-0

Alhashem, F., & Alfailakawi, A. (2023). Technology-enhanced learning through virtual laboratories in chemistry education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep474. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13739

Almalawi, A., Soh, B., Li, A., & Samra, H. (2024). Predictive models for educational purposes: A systematic review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(12), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8120187

Alnuaimi, M. A., & Awad, M. A. (2025). VR environment support for STEM students – a case study. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2527168

Arevalo-Cordovilla, F. E., & Pena, M. (2024). Comparative analysis of machine learning models for predicting student success in online programming courses: A study based on LMS data and external factors. Mathematics, 12(20), 3272. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12203272

Ayer Miller, V., Marks, T., & Thompson, D. K. (2025). Student performance and perceptions in a hybrid laboratory model: An exploratory study of interactive virtual simulations and in-person integration in a foundational microbiology course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 26(1), e00203-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00203-24

Baah, C., Govender, I., & Subramaniam, P. R. (2024). Enhancing Learning Engagement: A Study on Gamification’s Influence on Motivation and Cognitive Load. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101115

Bazie, H., Lemma, B., Workneh, A., & Estifanos, A. (2024). The effect of virtual laboratories on the academic achievement of undergraduate chemistry students: Quasi-experimental study. JMIR Formative Research, 8, e64476. https://doi.org/10.2196/64476

Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories. Computers & Education, 87, 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003

Castro, R. (2025). The effects of chemistry virtual laboratories in academic achievement of secondary level learners: A meta-analysis. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1379

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561

Dodevska, M., Zdravevski, E., Chorbev, I., Kostoska, M., Branco, F., Coelho, P., Pires, I., & Lameski, P. (2025). Virtual reality as a learning tool: Evaluating the use and effectiveness of simulation laboratories in educational settings. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101742

Elmoazen, H., Saqr, M., Khalil, H., & Wasson, B. (2023). Learning analytics in virtual laboratories: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00244-y

El-Sakka, N. A. (2025). The mediating role of students' engagement and satisfaction in the relationship between AI-based educational tools, flexible learning techniques, and the performance of students on academic probation. Scientific Journal for Financial and Commercial Studies and Research, 6(2, Part 1), 895–932. https://doi.org/10.21608/cfdj.2025.390585.2286

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001

Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23, 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9

Goyal, H., & Aleem, S. (2023). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and psychometric validation of Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control Questionnaire (HLPCQ) in India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 48(3), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_394_22

Griffin, C. S., Loughran, S., Kelly, B., Healy, E., Lambe, G., van Rossum, A., & Drumm, B. T. (2025). Virtual laboratories complement but should not replace face-to-face classes: perceptions of life science students at Dundalk Institute of Technology, Ireland. Advances in Physiology Education, 49(6), 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00227.2024

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Becker, J.-M. (2025). Covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): A SmartPLS 4 software tutorial. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 13, 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-025-00414-6

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Dhall, S. (2024). Role of virtual reality in advancing education with sustainability and identification of additive manufacturing as its cost-effective enabler. Sustainable Futures, 8, 100324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100324

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3

Lampropoulos, G., & Kinshuk. (2024). Virtual reality and gamification in education: a systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1691–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10351-3

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Lee, M. X., & Chongo, S. (2025). Effectiveness of virtual lab on year 5 students’ achievement and motivation in the topic of electricity. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(07), 2040–2048. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.907000169

Legaki, N.-Z., Xi, N., Hamari, J., Karpouzis, K., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2020). The effect of challenge-based gamification on learning: An experiment in the context of statistics education. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 144, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102496

Li, J., & Liang, W. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0316269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269

Lin, X. P., Li, B. B., Yao, Z. N., Yang, Z., & Zhang, M. (2024). The impact of virtual reality on student engagement in the classroom—A critical review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1360574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360574

Mahendra, I. G. B., & Killis, B. (2025). Impact of virtual laboratory-assisted microlearning on students’ motivation, engagement, and academic success. Journal of Learning for Development, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v12i1.1715

Makransky, G., Petersen, G. B., & Petkakis, G. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers & Education, 179, 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429

Nguyen-Viet, B., & Nguyen-Viet, B. (2025). The synergy of immersion and basic psychological needs satisfaction: Exploring gamification's impact on student engagement and learning outcomes. Acta Psychologica, 252, 104660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104660

Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Science Education, 96(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20463

Osmanli, T. (2025a). AI-enhanced predictive modelling of virtual laboratory microlearning in online distance education. Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information, 30(9), 2461–2471. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.300920

Osmanli, T. (2025b). Predictive analysis of student engagement and academic performance in virtual learning environments using a hybrid Markov–machine learning model. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 18(8), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2025/v18i8743

Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122

Parkavi, R., Karthikeyan, P., & Sheik Abdullah, A. (2024). Predicting academic performance of learners with the three domains of learning data using neuro-fuzzy model and machine learning algorithms. Journal of Engineering Research, 12(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.006

Portuguez-Castro, M., & Santos Garduno, H. (2024). Beyond traditional classrooms: Comparing virtual reality applications and their influence on students’ motivation. Education Sciences, 14(9), 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090963

Puiu, S., & Udristioiu, M. T. (2024). The behavioral intention to use virtual reality in schools: A technology acceptance model. Behavioral Sciences, 14(7), 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14070615

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778

Rafi, A., Habibi, A., & Kalantarion, M. (2025). Traditional medical education under siege: The revolutionary integration of virtual reality and gamification in medical escape rooms. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 898. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07367-5

Reginald, G. (2023). Teaching and learning using virtual labs: Investigating the effects on students’ self-regulation. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172308

Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles. Data in Brief, 48, 109074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109074

Sellberg, C., Nazari, Z., & Solberg, M. (2024). Virtual laboratories in STEM higher education: A scoping review. Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in Education, 2, 58–75. https://doi.org/10.23865/njsre.v2.5766

Singh, G., Mantri, A., Sharma, O., & Kaur, R. (2021). Virtual reality learning environment for enhancing electronics engineering laboratory experience. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22333

Singh, S., Kaur, A., & Gulzar, Y. (2024). The impact of augmented reality on education: A bibliometric exploration. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1458695. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1458695

Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). PLS-SEM for multivariate analysis: A practical guide to educational research using SmartPLS. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 4(3), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline2861

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Tarng, W., Su, Y.-C., & Ou, K.-L. (2023). Development of a virtual reality memory maze learning system for application in social science education. Systems, 11(11), 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11110545

Tatira, B., & Mshanelo, T. (2024). The impact of virtual laboratories on the academic performance of grade 12 learners in impulse and momentum. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8, 4150–4157. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2909

Thomann, H., Zimmermann, J., & Deutscher, V. (2024). How effective is immersive VR for vocational education? Analyzing knowledge gains and motivational effects. Computers & Education, 220, 105127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105127

Villena-Taranilla, R., Diago, P. D., & Colomer Rubio, J. C. (2025). Virtual reality as a pedagogical tool: Motivation and perception in teacher training for social sciences and history in primary education. Education Sciences, 15(4), 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040493

Weidlich, J., Gasevic, D., & Drachsler, H. (2022). Causal Inference and Bias in Learning Analytics: A Primer on Pitfalls Using Directed Acyclic Graphs. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(3), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7577

Wen, P., Lu, F., & Mohamad Ali, A. Z. (2024). Using attentional guidance methods in virtual reality laboratories reduces students’ cognitive load and improves their academic performance. Virtual Reality, 28(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-024-01012-0

Yanto, D. T. P., Ganefri, G., Sukardi, S., Kurani, R., & Yanto, J. P. (2023). Examining the practicality of mobile-based gamification assessment in electrical machine course: A study in industrial electrical engineering. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science, 5(1), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v5i1.2803

Zhao, S., Zhou, D., Wang, H., Chen, D., & Yu, L. (2025). Enhancing student academic success prediction through ensemble learning and image-based behavioral data transformation. Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031231

Zheng, H., Qian, Y., Wang, Z., & Wu, Y. (2023). Research on the influence of e-learning quality on the intention to continue e-learning: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA. Sustainability, 15(6), 5557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065557

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Osmanli, T. (2025). The Impact of Virtual Laboratories on Student Motivation and Academic Performance: An Integrated Fuzzy-Sem and Machine Learning Study. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS), 7(1), 414–438. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v7i1.9146