Risk-Based Public Procurement Corruption Prevention Strategy in the Palembang City Government

Muhammad Fadil Hidayat; Yusman  Syaukat; Harianto Harianto

doi:10.37385/ijedr.v5i2.3703

Authors

Muhammad Fadil Hidayat Institut Pertanian Bogor
Yusman Syaukat Institut Pertanian Bogor
Harianto Harianto Institut Pertanian Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v5i2.3703

Keywords:

Anti-corruption strategy, Corruption risk, Government procurement, Palembang

Abstract

Government procurement is the most vulnerable government activity to corruption, especially in the era of decentralization, which grants local governments the authority to manage their domestic affairs independently. The results of the Financial Audit Agency's (BPK) examination of the Palembang City Government in 2022 revealed indications of price manipulation, specifications favoring specific products and contractors, and goods and services produced not complying with the provisions in the contract. This research aims to formulate an anti-corruption strategy for government procurement based on corruption risk. The methods used in this research include descriptive analysis with a literature review, quantitative analysis using Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation (FSE), and strategy formulation using the Multicriteria Policy (Multipol) method involving government procurement stakeholders. The research findings indicate that the governance of government procurement in Palembang City is still inadequate, with the highest risks being related to implementer integrity, contract execution control, and procurement planning risks. Relevant anti-corruption strategies include the utilization of e-procurement, enhancing human resources and the Procurement Service Unit's (UKPBJ) competence, improving the quality of planning, and strengthening supervision and stakeholder participation.

References

Annisaa, Z., & Nurlaeli, S. (2022). Determinants of Whistleblowing Intentions: The Role of Education in Building Personal Integrity. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 7(1), 103–114.

Ardiyanti, A., & Supriadi, Y. N. (2018). Efektivitas pengendalian internal, dan kompetensi sumber daya manusia, terhadap implementasi good governance serta impikasinya pada pencegahan fraud dalam pengelolaan keuangan desa di kabupaten tangerang. Jurnal Akuntansi Manajerial (Managerial Accounting Journal), 3(1), 1–20.

Arsana, I. P. J. (2016). Manajemen pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Deepublish.

Arsyad, J. H., & Karisma, D. (2022). Sentralisasi Birokrasi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Sinar Grafika.

BPK. (2023). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan (LHP) Pemerintah Kota Palembang Tahun Anggaran 2022.

Fauzi, A. (2019). Teknik analisis keberlanjutan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Godet, M., & Durance, P. (2011). Strategic foresight for corporate and regional development. Unesco Publishing Paris.

Hansen, H. K. (2011). Managing corruption risks. Review of International Political Economy, 18(2), 251–275.

Hawkins, T. G., Gravier, M. J., & Powley, E. H. (2011). Public versus private sector procurement ethics and strategy: What each sector can learn from the other. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 567–586.

Kamal, M. (2019). Peta Resiko Fraud Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 9(2), 139–163.

KPK. (2023). TPK Berdasarkan Jenis Perkara. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-jenis-perkara

LKPP. (2022). Penilaian Final Indeks Tata Kelola Pengadaan (ITKP) Kementerian, Lembaga,dan Pemerintah Daerah Tahun 2022. https://siukpbj.lkpp.go.id/uploads/posts/2022_11_22_Hasil%20Final%20ITKP%20KLPD%20Tahun%202022.pdf

LKPP. (2023). Tingkat Kematangan UKPBJ. https://siukpbj.lkpp.go.id/

Locatelli, G., Mariani, G., Sainati, T., & Greco, M. (2017). Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room! International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 252–268.

Mu, S., Cheng, H., Chohr, M., & Peng, W. (2014). Assessing risk management capability of contractors in subway projects in mainland China. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), 452–460.

Nguyen, H. D., & Macchion, L. (2023). A comprehensive risk assessment model based on a fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for green building projects: the case of Vietnam. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(7), 2837–2861.

Nurharyanto. (2016). Pendekatan Teori Permainan Melakukan, Konsep Assesmen Risiko Fraud Untuk Pencegahan dan Pendeteksian Fraud Pada Sektor Publik. Karya Tulis Ilmiah, Majalah Kampus Pengawasan: Media Komunikasi Diklat Auditor, Edisi Januari.

Shan, M., Chan, A. P. C., Le, Y., Xia, B., & Hu, Y. (2015). Measuring corruption in public construction projects in China. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(4), 5015001.

Sharma, S. K., Sengupta, A., & Panja, S. C. (2019). Mapping corruption risks in public procurement: Uncovering improvement opportunities and strengthening controls. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(4), 947–975.

Suparman, N. (2020). Bureaucratic Corruptive Behavior: Causes And Motivation of State Civil Aparatures in Indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 5290–5303.

V OECD. (2016). Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement. OECD.

Zhao, X., Hwang, B.-G., & Gao, Y. (2016). A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: a case of Singapore’s green projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 203–213.