Peran Implementasi Smart Sustainable City Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Dengan E-Government Sebagai Pemediasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/msej.v7i1.10061Keywords:
Kinerja Pemerintah, Smart Sustainable City, E-governmentAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh implementasi smart sustainable city terhadap kinerja pemerintah di Kota Padang dengan dimediasi oleh e-government. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan melakukan survei melalui penyebaran kuesioner. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui LAKIP dari tahun 2020-2024. Populasi penelitian ini adalah 52 OPD di Kota Padang. Jumlah sampel pada penelitian ini adalah 152 responden. Teknik pengambilan sampel adalah non probability sampling yaitu menggunakan accidental sampling. Teknik analisis data pada penelitian ini adalah analisis regresi linear. Hasil penelitian ini berkontribusi memberikan bukti empiris terkait implementasi smart sustainable city terhadap kinerja pemerintah di Kota Padang dengan e-government sebagai pemediasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan peran implementasi smart sustainable city berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja pemerintah secara langsung dan juga secara tidak langsung melalui e-government sebagai pemediasi. E-government menjadi komponen utama dalam pengaruh implementasi smart sustainable city terhadap kinerja pemerintah. Dampaknya memperkuat legitimasi pemerintah, meningkatkan kepercayaan publik terhadap pemerintah, dan mendorong partisipasi masyarakat.
References
Abdussamad, Z., Karinda, K., Nursin, E., & Sandewa, F. (2024). E-Government di Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Bibliometrik dan Dampaknya pada Pengembangan Kajian Administrasi Publik. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa, 5(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v5i2.111
Akande, A., Cabral, P., Gomes, P., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44(October 2018), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009
Amosun, T. S., Chu, J., Rufai, O. H., Muhideen, S., Shahani, R., & Gonlepa, M. K. (2022). Does e-government help shape citizens’ engagement during the COVID-19 crisis? A study of mediational effects of how citizens perceive the government. Online Information Review, 46(5), 846–866. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2020-0478
Andini, F. S., Suherman, A., & Utami, P. (2023). Implementasi Strategi Electronic Government Dalam Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Cerdas Di Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Multilingual, 3(4), 1412–1482.
Angelina, J., Saerang, D. P. E., & Warongan, J. D. L. (2024). The influence of audit opinion, characteristics of regional head, and levels of corruption on performance of local government in Indonesia. 3(2), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.160
Anisa, C. F., & Hidayat, B. (2023). Penerapan Smart City Dalam Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Publik Di Kota Magelang. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v22i1.241
Boz, Y., & Cay, T. (2024). How smart and sustainable are the cities in Turkiye? - National policies and the enthusiasm level of the local governments. Heliyon, 10(4), e26002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26002
Buyannemekh, B., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Gascó-Hernández, M. (2023). Exploring emergent collaborations for digital transformation in local governments: The engagement of public libraries in the development of smart cities. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231197600
Crossley, R. M., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3740–3762. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2837
Dhaoui, I. (2022). E-Government for Sustainable Development: Evidence from MENA Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2070–2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00791-0
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., & Meijers, E. (2007). City-ranking of European medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT, October.
Guret, R., Albaar, M. R., & Samad, A. (2024). Smart City Planning to Create Good and Clean Government in Ternate City. Jurnal Ilmiah ILKOMINFO-Ilmu Komputer & Informatika, 7(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47324/ilkominfo.v7i2.267
Hashim, H. (2024). E-government impact on developing smart cities initiative in Saudi Arabia: Opportunities & challenges. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 96(April), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.04.008
Huovila, A., Bosch, P., & Airaksinen, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when? Cities, 89(January), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029
Izzuddin, F. N. (2022). Konsep Smart City Dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(3), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v2i3.96
Jameel, A., Asif, M., & Hussain, A. (2019). Good governance and public trust: Assessing the mediating effect of E-government in Pakistan. Lex Localis, 17(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.4335/17.2.299-320(2019)
Karal, F. S., & Soyer, A. (2024). A systematic literature review: Setting a basis for smart and sustainable city performance measurement. Sustainable Development, 32(1), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2693
Kim, N., Kim, G., Shim, S., Jang, S., Song, J., & Lee, B. (2024). Key Technologies for 6G-Enabled Smart Sustainable City. Electronics (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13020268
Kim, P., & Im, T. (2019). Comparing government performance indicators: A fuzzy-set analysis. Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 34(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.52372/kjps34201
Kusumastuti, R. D., Nurmala, N., Rouli, J., & Herdiansyah, H. (2022). Analyzing the factors that influence the seeking and sharing of information on the smart city digital platform: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Technology in Society, 68(September 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101876
Kuswati, Y., Hartati, T., & Kusmayadi, D. (2022). Implementation of E-Government-Based Policies in Improving Public Service Satisfaction in the Majalengka Regency Local Government. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 6(3), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v6i3.44831Lai, C. M. T., & Cole, A. (2023). Measuring progress of smart cities: Indexing the smart city indices. Urban Governance, 3(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.11.004
Lee, K., Choi, S. O., Kim, J., & Jung, M. (2018). A study on the factors affecting decrease in the government corruption and mediating effects of the development of ICT and E-government-a cross-country analysis. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4030041
Lim, Y., Edelenbos, J., & Gianoli, A. (2024). What is the impact of smart city development? Empirical evidence from a Smart City Impact Index. Urban Governance, 4(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.11.003
Lytras, M. D., & Serban, A. C. (2020). E-Government Insights to Smart Cities Research: European Union (EU) Study and the Role of Regulations. IEEE Access, 8, 65313–65326. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982737
Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Does e-government performance actually boost citizen use? Evidence from European countries. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1513–1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1412117
Macke, J., Rubim Sarate, J. A., & de Atayde Moschen, S. (2019). Smart sustainable cities evaluation and sense of community. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118103
Marizka, M. (2020). Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Analisis Kesiapan Kota Padang Menuju Smart City Melalui Pembangunan Command Center. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi, May 2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12084.81282
Mio, C., Fasan, M., Marcon, C., & Panfilo, S. (2020). The predictive ability of legitimacy and agency theory after the implementation of the EU directive on non-financial information. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2465–2476. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1968
Multama, I., Asniati, A., & Rahman, A. (2019). Analysis the Effect of E-Government Implementation on Quality of Information Towards Government to Government (G2G). 225(Icobest), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-11-2018.2288772
Nawafleh, S. (2020). The implementation of e-government and the trust of citizens in public sector performance: The mediating role of service quality. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 6(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2020.105086
Pratama, I. S., & Deviyanti, D. R. (2022). Volume . 18 Issue 3 ( 2022 ) Pages 540-550 INOVASI: Jurnal Ekonomi , Keuangan dan Manajemen ISSN: 0216-7786 ( Print ) 2528-1097 ( Online ) Pengaruh pengungkapan corporate social responsibility terhadap institutional ownership pada perusahaan high-profil. Jebm, 18(3), 540–550. https://doi.org/10.29264/jinv.v18i3.11701
Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81(February), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014
Sari, D. N., Rahmadani, D. Z., & Wardani, M. Y. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya Dalam Mewujudkan Inovasi Smart City. Journal of Governance Innovation, 2(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v2i2.435
Shamsuzzoha, A., Niemi, J., Piya, S., & Rutledge, K. (2021). Smart city for sustainable environment: A comparison of participatory strategies from Helsinki, Singapore and London. Cities, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103194
Silva, S. (2021). Corporate contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals: An empirical analysis informed by legitimacy theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 125962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125962
Sun, P. L., Ku, C. Y., & Shih, D. H. (2015). An implementation framework for E-Government 2.0. Telematics and Informatics, 32(3), 504–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.12.003
Sunardi, S., Djazuli, A., Handayani, R. D., Hidayat, B. A., & Saksono, H. (2022). The Role of Human Development in Improving Local Government Performance Through Good Government Governance. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(3), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.571-582
Supratiwi, W., . I., & Angesti Octorizki, F. (2019). The Role of Good Government Governance on the Influence of E-Government Implementation Toward Local Government Performance. KnE Social Sciences, 3(11), 540–548. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i11.4033
Sutopo, B., Wulandari, T. R., & Saputra, A. (2017). E-Government , Audit Opini , dan Kinerja Lokal Administrasi Pemerintahan di Indonesia.
Wey, W.-M., & Peng, T.-C. (2021). Study on Building a Smart Sustainable City Assessment Framework Using Big Data and Analytic Network Process. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000704
Zhang, Jiasheng, Li, H., & Yang, K. (2022). A Meta-Analysis of the Government Performance—Trust Link: Taking Cultural and Methodological Factors into Account. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13439
Zhang, Junru, Zheng, C., & Shan, Y. G. (2024). What accounts for the effect of sustainability engagement on stock price crash risk during the COVID-19 pandemic—Agency theory or legitimacy theory? International Review of Financial Analysis, 93(December 2023), 103167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103167
Template
