Pengaruh Pembangunan Kepercayaan, Dialog Tatap Muka, Komitmen Proses, Serta Pemahaman Bersama Dan Hasil Awal Terhadap Keberhasilan Tata Kelola Kolaboratif Se Kelurahan Kota Banjarbaru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/msej.v7i4.10609Keywords:
Collaborative Governance; Trust Building, Face-to-Face Dialogue, Process Commitment, Shared Understanding, Intermediate Outcome.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effects of trust building, face-to-face dialogue, commitment to process, and shared understanding with intermediate outcomes on collaborative governance success across all urban villages in Banjarbaru City. This research employs a quantitative explanatory survey design. Data were collected through questionnaires from collaborative actors at the village level and analyzed using multiple linear regression to examine both partial and simultaneous relationships among variables. The results show that trust building has a positive and significant effect on collaborative governance success, indicating that inter-actor trust, transparency, and accountability are key drivers of effective collaboration. Face-to-face dialogue demonstrates a significant negative relationship, suggesting that intensive interactions without clear direction and follow-up may reduce collaborative effectiveness. Commitment to process does not show a significant partial effect, indicating that procedural commitment mainly functions as a supporting mechanism rather than a direct determinant of outcomes. Shared understanding and intermediate outcomes exhibit a significant negative effect, implying that unmanaged preliminary agreements may create excessive expectations and hinder final outcomes. Simultaneously, all variables significantly influence collaborative governance success, confirming that collaborative governance operates as an integrated and dynamic system where relational, communicative, and procedural dimensions interact to shape policy outcomes.
References
Abdillah, A. (2024). Koordinasi antar lembaga dalam tata kelola kolaboratif. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 15(2), 45–60.
Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2017). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.
Ahmed, S., & Rahman, M. (2022). Citizen participation improves the quality of governance outcomes when decision-making is inclusive and deliberative. Public Management Review, 24(3), 321–339.
Ahsan, K., & Alam, M. (2023). Accountability and transparency as pillars of good governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(5), 389–402.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Avoyan, E. (2024). Effectiveness of village fund management in economic and infrastructure development. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 112–125.
Bae, B. (2024). The effect of collaborative governance in social startups on social performance. Social Enterprise Journal, 20(1), 78–95.
Calò, F. (2024). The role of deliberative dialogue in collaborative governance. Public Administration Review.
Cairney, P. (2024). Trust and collaboration in public policy. Policy & Politics, 52(1), 1–20.
Cho, Y., Noh, J., Roggio, A., & Luna-Reyes, L. (2023). Trust building in cross-sector collaboration: Evidence from food policy networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(2), 234–250.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dianty, S. (2025). Effectiveness of collaboration between government and BPD in village infrastructure development. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 12(1), 88–102.
Dinas DP3PMP2KB Kota Banjarbaru. (2025). Laporan evaluasi perkembangan kelurahan Kota Banjarbaru.
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.
Enhancing good governance and fraud prevention in public organizations. (2025). International Journal of Public Sector Management.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
Garvera, E., et al. (2021). Collaborative governance and stakeholder overlap. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 654–667.
Gemilang, A. (2025). Implementasi kolaborasi dalam kebijakan publik. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 10(2), 134–150.
Ghozali, I. (2005). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 21. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Grootjans, S., et al. (2022). Trust building in early stages of cross-sector collaboration. Public Management Review, 24(5), 721–740.
Gunawan, A. (2014). Tata kelola pelayanan publik di tingkat kecamatan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(1), 22–35.
Haapasaari, A. (2024). Sustainability and collaborative governance in environmental policy. Environmental Policy and Governance, 34(1), 45–60.
Hartati, S., & Nugroho, R. (2020). Evaluasi implementasi inovasi layanan publik berbasis kolaborasi di tingkat kelurahan. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(2), 145–160.
Irsyad, M., dkk. (2020). Kolaborasi dalam program inovasi pembangunan dan pemberdayaan kewilayahan di Kelurahan Babakan Ciparay. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Pembangunan, 12(2), 98–115.
Khan, M., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Indicators of good governance and institutional performance. Governance Studies Quarterly, 19(1), 55–72.
Khan, R., Ahmed, T., & Malik, S. (2024). Collective commitment in cross-sector policy implementation. Policy Studies Journal, 52(2), 201–220.
Krczal, A. (2024). Trust and capacity for joint action in collaborative governance. Public Policy and Administration Review, 12(1), 33–49.
Lee, S. (2022). Managing power asymmetry in collaborative governance. Public Administration Quarterly, 46(3), 356–380.
Lestari, R. (2022). Sinergi aktor dalam tata kelola pemerintahan kelurahan. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 10(1), 77–90.
Lestari, R., & Yulyana, E. (2022). Konsep pembangunan wilayah berbasis kolaborasi. Jurnal Pembangunan Daerah, 5(2), 45–60.
Media Center Banjarbaru. (2024). Forum Musrenbang dan penguatan CSR/TJSP Kota Banjarbaru.
Mutonyi, M., & Mdee, A. (2024). Actor roles and negotiated outcomes in collaborative governance. Development Policy Review, 42(1), 90–108.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
O’Leary, R. (2020). Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going? American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 635–646.
Ramdhani, A. (2020). Akuntabilitas dan partisipasi publik dalam pembangunan daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 14(1), 11–25.
Santoso, S. (2012). Analisis SPSS pada statistik parametrik. Elex Media Komputindo.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley.
Situngkir, H. (2021). Responsivitas pemerintah daerah dalam pelayanan publik. Jurnal Governance, 9(2), 120–134.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
UNDP. (2018). Good governance and sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 82 Tahun 2022 tentang Pembentukan Kota Banjarbaru sebagai Ibu Kota Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan.
Wulandari, D., & Fathoni, A. (2021). Peran organisasi kemasyarakatan dalam pembangunan lokal. Jurnal Sosial dan Politik, 3(2), 101–118.
Template
