What Shapes Leadership? A Systematic Literature Review Of Communication, Interaction, And Social Construction Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/msej.v7i1.9923Keywords:
Leadership, Communication, Social Construction, Interaction, Meaning-Making, Relational LeadershipAbstract
This systematic literature review examines what shapes leadership through the lenses of communication, interaction, and social construction. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship from leadership studies and communication theory, the review synthesizes research that conceptualizes leadership not as an individual trait or positional authority, but as a dynamic, relational, and communicative process. Using a systematic search and screening procedure, the study analyzes key theoretical and empirical contributions that emphasize meaning-making, interactional practices, discourse, and socially constructed realities in leadership processes. The findings indicate that leadership emerges through ongoing communication, including sensemaking, framing, dialogue, and negotiated interactions among leaders, followers, and broader stakeholders. Rather than residing solely in individuals, leadership is shown to be co-constructed within social contexts shaped by language, power relations, cultural norms, and organizational settings. This review highlights a shift from leader-centric models toward relational, distributed, and process-oriented perspectives, underscoring communication as constitutive of leadership itself. The study contributes to leadership scholarship by integrating communication and social construction perspectives into a coherent framework, offering implications for future research and leadership development practices that prioritize interaction, reflexivity, and collective meaning-making in complex organizational and social environments.
References
Antonakis, J., Schriesheim, C. A., Donovan, J. A., Gopalakrishna-Pillai, K., Pellegrini, E. K., & Rossomme, J. L. (2023). Methods for studying leadership. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 48–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539002
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903047186
Banwart, M. C. (2020). Communication studies: Effective communication leads to effective leadership. In New Directions for Student Leadership, 2020(165), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20371
Barge, J. K. (2004). Reflexivity and managerial practice. Communication Monographs, 71(1), 70–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000188417
Fairhurst, G. T., & Connaughton, S. L. (2024). Leadership: A communicative perspective. Leadership, 10(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715013509396
Gronn, P. (2023). Leadership: Who needs it? School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000112784
Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (2021). On the development of communication theory: Some reflections. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679109
Moffitt, B. W. T. (2025). A beginning synthesis of leadership and communication studies. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(3), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199500200311
Steil, L. K. (2021). The relevance of modern organization theory to organizational communication. Central States Speech Journal, 22(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977109363052
Template


