Designing Digital Employee Performance Management System for PT. Kreasi Edulab Indonesia

Authors

  • Megawaty Masfufah Bandung Institute of Technology
  • Aurik Gustomo Bandung Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v7i2.10206

Keywords:

Employee Performance Management System, Digital EPMS, Continuous Feedback, Performance Evaluation, Change Management

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of the employee performance management system at PT. Edulab Indonesia, identify its main weaknesses, and analyze organizational needs and challenges in managing employee performance. The findings reveal that the current system is still managed manually using Google spreadsheets with quarterly performance recapitulation, leading to inefficiencies, low transparency, subjective evaluations, and limited audit trails, which ultimately hinder effective monitoring, data-driven decision-making, and alignment between actual performance and strategic objectives. In response, the study highlights the need for clear goal alignment across organizational, divisional, and individual levels; real-time performance monitoring; standardized and objective evaluation mechanisms; continuous and documented feedback; and stronger integration between performance evaluation outcomes and employee competency development, while also acknowledging challenges such as uneven digital literacy, resistance to change, lack of a continuous feedback culture, and infrastructure limitations. This research employs a qualitative approach through in-depth interviews and document analysis, with data analyzed using NVivo to identify key themes related to system weaknesses, organizational needs, and implementation barriers. The system design is guided by the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework and the ADKAR change management model to ensure alignment with organizational readiness, technological capability, external environment, and human factors. As a result, the study proposes step-by-step to Design Digital Employee Performance Management System (DEPMS) based on continuous feedback, comprising five core modules: digital goal setting and alignment, real-time performance monitoring dashboards, standardized digital performance evaluation, continuous feedback mechanisms, and audit trail–based reporting. The proposed system is shown to enhance performance management effectiveness by improving objectivity and transparency, accelerating decision-making, strengthening accountability, and directly linking performance evaluation outcomes to employee development, thereby supporting a more agile and data-driven organizational culture.

References

Aguinis, H. (2019). Performance management (4th ed.). Chicago Business Press.

Aguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2021). Talent management challenges during COVID-19 and beyond: Performance management to the rescue. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 24(4), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211009509

Armstrong, M. (2020). Armstrong’s handbook of performance management (7th ed.). Kogan Page.

Cascio, W. F. (2018). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000085

Gallup. (2020). State of the American workplace. Gallup Press.

Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Prosci Research.

Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2018). Human resource management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Naeem, M. (2023). Thematic analysis in qualitative research: A practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 20(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231165968

Pulakos, E. D., Hanson, R. M., Arad, S., & Moye, N. (2015). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2014.75

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson Education.

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-25

How to Cite

Masfufah, M., & Gustomo, A. (2026). Designing Digital Employee Performance Management System for PT. Kreasi Edulab Indonesia. Community Engagement and Emergence Journal (CEEJ), 7(2), 1135–1141. https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v7i2.10206