The Technology Acceptance Models in Preventive Maintenance System Utillity in Pharmaceutical Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v7i3.10391Keywords:
TAM2, E-EMS, GMP, Digitalization, Technology AcceptanceAbstract
PT XYZ has implemented digital transformation through the development of an Electronic Equipment Management System (E-EMS) in response to the need for effective and efficient manual recording and preventive maintenance utilities in the GMP area. This web-based application integrates all data components as well as preventive maintenance schedules and reports, thereby strengthening inspection readiness and compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). However, the extent to which the adoption of E-EMS, attitudes toward its use, and utilization of the system affect GMP indicators remains unknown. This study aims to analyze the influence of perceived ease of use (PeoU) on perceived usefulness (PU) and attitude toward using (ATU), and behavioral intention to use (BItU) on actual system usage (ASU) as indicators of GMP achievement. The method used is a quantitative approach with an explanatory survey design to test the relationship between constructs. It also includes social influences and cognitive-instrumental processes such as subjective norm, image, job relevance, output quality, and result demonstrability, with experience and voluntaries as contextual factors that can influence the relationship between variables in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM2). Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using Descriptive Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The results show that perceived usefulness (PU) is significantly influenced by output quality (OQ), result demonstrability (RD), and job relevance (JR). The social factors of subjective norm (SN), image (Im), and experience (Ex) have no direct effect. Perceived ease of use (PEoU) has a positive and significant effect on perceived usefulness (PU). Employee attitudes are more influenced by ease than benefits (PEoU ® ATU), while PU ® ATU is not significant, meaning that PT XYZ employees have a positive attitude toward E-EMS when the system feels practical and not difficult, not because the system is useful. However, the attitude of continuous use intention arises when the system has positive and convenient characteristics driven by ease.
References
Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM). (2018). Peraturan Badan POM tentang Pedoman Cara Pembuatan Obat yang Baik (CPOB).
Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. (2024). Pedoman Cara Pembuatan Obat yang Baik. Diambil dari sumber: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/345540/peraturan-bpom-no-7-tahun-2024.
Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. (2024). Peraturan Badan POM Nomor 7 Tahun 2024 tentang Cara Pembuatan Obat yang Baik (CPOB). BPOM RI.
Bokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., Wuest, T., & Stahre, J. (2020). Smart maintenance: A research agenda for industrial maintenance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107547
British Standards Institution. (2017). BS EN 13306:2017 Maintenance—Maintenance terminology (Standard).
Brunetti, F., Matt, D. T., Bonfanti, A., De Longhi, A., Pedrini, G., & Orzes, G. (2020). Digital transformation challenges: Strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 697–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0309
Buer, S.-V., Fragapane, G. I., & Strandhagen, J. O. (2018). Using digitalization for continuous improvement: The data-driven process improvement cycle. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.471
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). (n.d.). 21 CFR 211.68—Automatic, mechanical, and electronic equipment.
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. (n.d.). 21 CFR § 211.67 Equipment cleaning and maintenance.
Elnadi, M., Abd-Elwahed, M. S. (2023). Industry 4.0: Critical investigations and synthesis of key findings. Vol. 74 Pages 711-744. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11301-022-00314-4
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Hole, G. Hole, A.S. and McFalone-Shaw. (2021). Digitalization in pharmaceutical industry: What to focus on under the digital implementation process?. International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X 3 - 100095.
Ilmi, M., Agung, C., & Kurniawan, A. (2020). [Artikel tentang evaluasi TAM (PU & PEOU) pada penerapan sistem/teknologi]. Relasi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Vol. 16 No. 2. https://jurnal.itsm.ac.id/index.php/relasi/article/view/371
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Acatech – National Academy of Science and Engineering.
Kaswan, Cross, J., Garza-reyes, J.A. and Antony, J. 2022. Integrating green lean six sigma and industry 4. 0: a conceptual framework. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(1), 87-121. https://doi: 10.1108/JMTM-03-2022-0115.
Khanzode, A. G., Sarma, P. R. S., Mangla, S. K., Yuan, H. (2021). Modeling the Industry 4.0 adoption for sustainable production in micro, small & medium enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production. 279(6127):123489. https://DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123489
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 752–780.
MaintMaster Systems AB. (2024). Maintenance Manual 2024 EN (Manual; terminology reproduced with authorization from SS-EN 13306).
Nurcahyo, R., & Nurdini, A. (2024). Manajemen Pemeliharaan Preventive (Preventive Maintenance): Teori dan Aplikasi (Cetakan pertama). PT Pena Persada Kerta Utama. ISBN 978-623-167-665-8.
Robbins, S. P., Bergman, R., Coulter, M., & DeCenzo, D. A. (2017). Management (8th ed.). Pearson.
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90–103.
Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., & Johnston, R. (2019). Operations management (9th ed.) [Preview]. Pearson.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2003). Guidance for Industry: Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures—Scope and Application.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
Vial, G. (2019) Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and A Research Agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Vol. 28(2): 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
World Health Organization. (2014). TRS 986—Annex 2: WHO good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products: Main principles. WHO.
World Health Organization. (2015). WHO good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products: main principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 986, Annex 2). WHO.
World Health Organization. (2015). WHO guidance on good data and record management practices. WHO.
World Health Organization. (2016). Guidance on good data and record management practices (WHO Technical Report Series No. 996, Annex 5). WHO.
World Health Organization. (2019). TRS 1019—Annex 3: Good manufacturing practices: Guidelines on validation. WHO.
World Health Organization. (2021). WHO guidelines on the quality of water for pharmaceutical use. In WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: Fifty-fifth report (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1033, Annex). WHO.
Template
