Pengaruh Hope, Self-Efficacy, dan Resilience Terhadap Safety Behavior melalui Work Engagement pada Industri Manufaktur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v7i1.11474Keywords:
Psychological Capital, Hope, Self-Efficacy, Resilience, Work Engagement, Safety BehaviorAbstract
Dalam industri pengolahan kaca, keselamatan kerja tidak hanya berbicara tentang perlindungan karyawan, tetapi berbicara juga tentang kelancaran produksi, kualitas produk, efisiensi biaya, dan kemampuan perusahaan memenuhi kebutuhan pelanggan. Pada lingkungan kerja yang memiliki tingkat risiko tinggi, satu faktor yang menentukan keberhasilan operasional perusahaan salah satunya adalah perilaku keselamatan karyawan. Oleh karena itu, faktor individu dan tingkat keterlibatan karyawan terhadap pekerjaan perlu dipahami untuk mendukung terciptanya perilaku kerja yang aman. Oleh karena itu penelitian dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Hope, Self-efficacy, dan Resilience terhadap Safety Compliance dan Safety Participation melalui Work Engagement pada karyawan PT Prakatama Kreasi Unilindo. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan teknik total sampling terhadap 150 karyawan operasional. Data diperoleh melalui penyebaran kuesioner dan dianalisis menggunakan Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) dengan bantuan SmartPLS 4. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Hope dan Self-efficacy berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap Work Engagement. Hope juga berpengaruh positif terhadap Safety Compliance, sedangkan Self-Efficacy berpengaruh positif terhadap Safety Compliance dan Safety Participation. Sebaliknya, Resilience tidak menunjukkan pengaruh yang berarti terhadap Work Engagement maupun kedua dimensi perilaku keselamatan kerja. Pada penelitian ini ditemukan juga bahwa Work Engagement berperan dalam menjelaskan hubungan antara Hope dan Self-Efficacy dengan perilaku keselamatan kerja, namun tidak mampu menjelaskan hubungan antara Resilience dan perilaku keselamatan kerja. Penelitian ini mengembangkan model Saleem et al. (2022) dengan memisahkan psychological capital menjadi tiga dimensi, yaitu Hope, Self-Efficacy, dan Resilience, serta membedakan safety behavior menjadi Safety Compliance dan Safety Participation. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada industri manufaktur berisiko tinggi, perilaku keselamatan kerja lebih dipengaruhi oleh keyakinan terhadap kemampuan diri, kejelasan tujuan kerja, dan keterlibatan karyawan terhadap pekerjaannya dibandingkan kemampuan bertahan dalam menghadapi tekanan kerja.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/design/article/download/1887/1414
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2020). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(3), 273–285. https://ryanmberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/EBSCO-FullText-07_10_2025.pdf
Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2021).
Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(1), 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1769685
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2020). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 73(1), 89–136. https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/4b29bb24n
Gao, Y., Yue, Y., & Li, X. (2023). The relationship between psychological capital and work engagement of kindergarten teachers: A latent profile analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1084836. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10033521/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229100915_Toward_A_Knowledge-Based_Theory_of_the_Firm?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Hertanto, E., Prasetyo, A., & Nugroho, Y. (2023). Safety climate and safety behavior in industrial workers: Evidence from Indonesia. Safety, 9(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040089
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018).
Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
Hongdiyanto, C. (2024). The Mediated Role of Knowledge Sharing Between Servant Leadership and Work Role Performance. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 7(6), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i6p125
Hongdiyanto, C., Halcon, F. A., Yusup, A. K., & Ongkowijoyo, G. (2025). The Mediating Effect of Organizational Culture and Work Fatigue on Work-Life Balance in the Context of Work from Home among Indonesian Workers. Journal The Winners, 26(2), 107–120.
International Labour Organization. (2021).
World employment and social outlook: Trends 2021. International Labour Office.
Kissel, P., & Büttgen, M. (2015). Using social media to communicate employer brand identity: The impact on corporate image and employer attractiveness. Journal of Brand Management, 22(9), 755–777. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marion-Buettgen/publication/287147373
Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2021). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=oqSuBgAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&ots=FLRn3v2s8w&dq=Luthans
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mark-Griffin-6/publication/6950128
Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F., & Hirst, G. (2020). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(3), 234–256. https://www.scribd.com/document/409543458/newman2014-reviewPsyCap
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press. http://www.sietmanagement.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/nonaka_1991.pdf
Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Do-it-yourself: An online positive psychology intervention to promote positive emotions, self-efficacy, and engagement at work. Career Development International, 26(3), 173–188. https://affinityhealthhub.co.uk/d/attachments/5-ouweneel-et-al-2013-1526911070.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Saleem, M. S., Isha, A. S. N., & Awan, M. (2022). Psychological capital and safety behavior: The mediating role of work engagement. Safety Science, 145, 105493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.810145
Saraih, U. N., Amlus, M. H., Sakdan, M. F., & Ahmad, R. (2021).
Safety behaviour among employees in the Malaysian manufacturing industry. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2339(1), 020179.https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0045158
Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Engaging leadership: How to promote work engagement? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556
Sivertzen, A. M., Nilsen, E. R., & Olafsen, A. H. (2013). Employer branding: Employer attractiveness and the use of social media. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(7), 473–483. https://www.scribd.com/document/509837487/2?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Sun, Y., Fang, Y., & Wang, X. (2022). How safety climate impacts safety voice: Investigating the mediating role of psychological safety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 11867. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/11867
Snyder, C. R. (2002).
Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275.
https://blogs.shu.ac.uk/growplus/files/2020/02/Hope-Synder-paper.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2020). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 27(2), 125–138. https://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/270.pdf
Template
