Pengaruh Penggunaan Generative AI Terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak UMKM: Peran Mediasi Pemahaman Pajak dan Moderasi Literasi Digital

Authors

  • Glenn Andrenossa Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Dzahin Syauqi Muhammad Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Sifera Patricia Maithy Universitas Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v7i2.11705

Keywords:

Generative AI, Kepatuhan Pajak, UMKM, Literasi Digital, Pemahaman Pajak

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah mendorong perubahan mendasar dalam administrasi perpajakan, terutama pada cara wajib pajak memperoleh informasi serta melaksanakan kewajiban perpajakannya. Salah satu inovasi yang berkembang pesat adalah Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI), yang memberikan kemudahan bagi pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) untuk memperoleh informasi perpajakan secara lebih cepat, interaktif, dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan pengguna. Meskipun pemanfaatannya semakin luas, bukti empiris mengenai pengaruh teknologi tersebut terhadap kepatuhan pajak UMKM di Indonesia masih relatif terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh penggunaan Generative AI terhadap kepatuhan pajak UMKM dengan menguji peran mediasi pemahaman pajak serta peran moderasi literasi digital. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif melalui survei terhadap 250 pelaku UMKM yang telah memanfaatkan teknologi digital dalam kegiatan usahanya. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan Generative AI berkontribusi positif terhadap peningkatan pemahaman perpajakan sekaligus mendorong kepatuhan pajak. Selain itu, pemahaman pajak terbukti berperan sebagai mediator parsial dalam hubungan tersebut, sedangkan literasi digital memperkuat pengaruh Generative AI terhadap kepatuhan pajak. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa Generative AI tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai media pencarian informasi, tetapi juga sebagai sarana pembelajaran digital yang mampu meningkatkan kepatuhan sukarela wajib pajak UMKM. Secara teoretis, penelitian ini memperkaya pengembangan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dan Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) dalam menjelaskan perilaku kepatuhan pajak pada era kecerdasan buatan, sekaligus memberikan implikasi praktis bagi pengembangan strategi edukasi perpajakan berbasis teknologi digital.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alm, J. (2019). What motivates tax compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12272

Bobek, D. D., & Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2003.15.1.13

Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., et al. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models.

Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., Lee, P., Lee, Y. T., Li, Y., Lundberg, S., Nori, H., et al. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. 2303.12712.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Damayanti, R., & Martono, S. (2023). Tax knowledge and MSME tax compliance in Indonesia: Evidence from self-assessment taxpayers. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Perpajakan Indonesia, 7(2), 145–162.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2024). Laporan kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Pajak tahun 2023. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., et al. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia. (2024). Perkembangan data usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah tahun 2024. Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM RI.

Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press.

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The slippery slope framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research. British Accounting Review, 51(6), 100833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.04.002

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

OECD. (2022). Tax administration 2022: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023). Tax administration 2023: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2024). Artificial intelligence in tax administration: Opportunities and challenges. OECD Publishing.

Palil, M. R. (2010). Tax knowledge and tax compliance determinants in self-assessment system in Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management, 4(15), 3399–3408.

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2024). SmartPLS 4 user manual. SmartPLS GmbH.

Saad, N. (2014). Tax knowledge, tax complexity and tax compliance: Taxpayers' view. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1069–1075.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.590

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618823921

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley.

Sutton, S. G., Holt, M., & Arnold, V. (2023). The future of accounting and artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges. Accounting Horizons, 37(3), 127–145.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi 3). Alfabeta.

Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. Palgrave Macmillan.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wahyuni, S., Nugroho, A., & Prasetyo, T. (2022). Digital taxation and taxpayer compliance in Indonesia: The role of electronic tax systems. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 10(2), 215–228.

Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Deng, Z. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence adoption in small business environments: Implications for learning and decision making. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(1), 145–163.

Zhai, X. (2024). ChatGPT and AI-assisted learning: A systematic review of emerging educational applications. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4123–4148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12185-3.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Pengaruh Penggunaan Generative AI Terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak UMKM: Peran Mediasi Pemahaman Pajak dan Moderasi Literasi Digital. (2026). Community Engagement and Emergence Journal (CEEJ), 7(2), 1804-1823. https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v7i2.11705