Persepsi Responden terhadap Pengembangan Sagu Papua sebagai Basis Pemberdayaan Sosial-Ekonomi dan Bioekonomi Berkelanjutan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v7i4.12101Keywords:
sagu; pemberdayaan sosial-ekonomi; bioekonomi berkelanjutan; ketahanan pangan; ekonomi sirkular; PapuaAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis persepsi responden terhadap pengembangan sagu Papua sebagai basis pemberdayaan sosial-ekonomi dan bioekonomi berkelanjutan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan survei daring terhadap 32 responden yang berdomisili di Kota Jayapura dan berasal dari kelompok mahasiswa/akademisi, konsumen produk sagu, tokoh masyarakat/adat, petani/pengolah sagu, pedagang, serta pelaku UMKM berbasis sagu. Instrumen memuat 22 pernyataan skala Likert lima tingkat yang dikelompokkan ke dalam empat dimensi: nilai pangan, sosial, dan budaya; pemberdayaan masyarakat lokal; pemanfaatan limbah sagu; serta bioekonomi, ketahanan pangan, dan keberlanjutan. Analisis mencakup frekuensi, persentase, rata-rata, tingkat capaian responden (TCR), distribusi jawaban Likert, dan klasifikasi tematik jawaban terbuka. Hasil menunjukkan seluruh dimensi berada pada kategori sangat tinggi. Pemberdayaan masyarakat lokal memperoleh TCR 96,2%, bioekonomi, ketahanan pangan, dan keberlanjutan 96,0%, pemanfaatan limbah sagu 94,8%, serta nilai pangan, sosial, dan budaya sagu 93,6%. Skor item berkisar 4,56–4,88; pelestarian hutan sagu memperoleh skor tertinggi (4,88), sedangkan ketahanan pangan serta pengemasan dan pemasaran produk masing-masing memperoleh 4,84. Jawaban terbuka menempatkan pakan ternak/ikan sebagai pemanfaatan limbah yang paling sering disebut, sementara pemasaran-promosi serta pelatihan-sosialisasi muncul sebagai kendala utama. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa agenda pengembangan sagu yang dipersepsikan prioritas oleh responden tidak cukup berfokus pada produksi, tetapi perlu mengintegrasikan pelibatan masyarakat, inovasi produk, valorisasi limbah, penguatan rantai nilai dan pasar, serta konservasi hutan sagu. Karena ukuran sampel kecil dan tidak dirancang untuk generalisasi probabilistik, hasil diposisikan sebagai pemetaan eksploratif bagi perumusan strategi pengembangan sagu di tingkat lokal.
References
Jaganathan, J. S., Sheikh Abdullah, S. R., Mohd Ali, J., Kurniawan, S. B., & Subramaniam, S. V. (2025). State-of-the-art approaches in sago wastewater treatment and resource recovery: Towards a circular and sustainable industry. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 13(5), 117617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.117617
Busthanul, N., Heliawaty, H., Bakri, R., Syafiuddin, M., Syam, S. H., Sabania, H., & Rahmawaty, N. (2025). Cost and trend analysis of sago processed businesses in North Luwu and Palopo City, South Sulawesi Province. International Journal of Agriculture System, 13(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.20956/ijas.v13i1.6012
Cooksey, R. W. (2020). Descriptive statistics for summarising data. In Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data (pp. 61–139). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7_5
Dimara, P. A., Purwanto, R., Auri, A., Angrianto, R., & Mofu, W. (2023). Production potential of sago forests in different habitat types in Sentani watershed, Papua, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 24. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240731
Ferraz, D., & Pyka, A. (2023). Circular economy, bioeconomy, and sustainable development goals: A systematic literature review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29632-0
Fetriyuna, F., Purwestri, R. C., Letsoin, S. M. A., Jati, I. R. A. P., Rahmawan, F., Wirawan, N. N., et al. (2025). Exploring the implication of changes in forest cover on sago nutrients: Insights from monitoring in selected regions of Papua, Indonesia. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1373768
Fitriani, T., Tambaip, B., Tambajong, H., Lekatompesy, R., & Saragih, D. P. (2022). The food security policy model in the village government. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1107(1), 012099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1107/1/012099
Holden, N. M., Neill, A. M., Stout, J. C., O’Brien, D., & Morris, M. A. (2023). Biocircularity: A framework to define sustainable, circular bioeconomy. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00180-y
Kadir, A., Suharno, S., Reawaruw, Y. N. I., Ali, A., & Putra, M. F. P. (2024). Sago Sep: Traditional food sources in eastern Indonesia and their potential as alternative foods for athletes. Retos, 61, 544–551. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.109661
Koo, M., & Yang, S.-W. (2025). Likert-type scale. Encyclopedia, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010018
Makkarennu, M., Katsuya, O., & Kadir, A. R. (2018). Business development strategy of sago for food security. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 196(1), 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/196/1/012013
Miller, A. L., & Lambert, A. D. (2014). Open-ended survey questions: Item nonresponse nightmare or qualitative data dream? Survey Practice, 7(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2014-0024
Mujtaba, M., Fraceto, L. F., Fazeli, M., Mukherjee, S., Savassa, S. M., de Medeiros, G. A., Pereira, A. E. S., Mancini, S. D., Lipponen, J., & Vilaplana, F. (2023). Lignocellulosic biomass from agricultural waste to the circular economy: A review with focus on biofuels, biocomposites and bioplastics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 402, 136815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136815
Ondikeleuw, Y., Wahyudi, & Arifudin, M. (2020). Utilization of biomass from sago (Metroxylon sp.) by local ethnic around the Sentani Lake, Jayapura, Papua Province. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 935(1), 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/935/1/012023
Pramana, A., Adhianata, H., Zamaya, Y., Nopiani, Y., & Alvionita, P. (2021). Acceleration of sago food diversification in improving the welfare of sago farmers in Riau Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 934, 012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/934/1/012091
Rasyid, T. H., Kusumawaty, Y., & Hadi, S. (2020). The utilization of sago waste: Prospect and challenges. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 415(1), 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/415/1/012023
Salvador, R., Barros, M. V., Donner, M., Brito, P., Halog, A., & De Francisco, A. C. (2022). How to advance regional circular bioeconomy systems? Identifying barriers, challenges, drivers, and opportunities. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.025
Salvador, R., Barros, M. V., Pieroni, M., Lopes Silva, D. A., Freire, F., & De Francisco, A. C. (2023). Overarching business models for a circular bioeconomy: Systematising archetypes. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 43, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.11.010
Sidiq, F. F., Coles, D., Hubbard, C., Clark, B., & Frewer, L. J. (2021). Sago and the indigenous peoples of Papua, Indonesia: A review. Journal of Agriculture and Applied Biology, 2(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.11594/jaab.02.02.08
Sidiq, F. F., Coles, D., Hubbard, C., Clark, B., & Frewer, L. J. (2022). Factors influencing consumption of traditional diets: Stakeholder views regarding sago consumption among the indigenous peoples of West Papua. Agriculture & Food Security, 11, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00390-5
Susanto, B., Tosuli, Y. T., Adnan, Cahyadi, Nami, H., Surjosatyo, A., et al. (2024). Characterization of sago tree parts from Sentani, Papua, Indonesia for biomass energy utilization. Heliyon, 10(1), e23993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e23993
Timisela, N. R., Masyhuri, M., & Darwanto, D. H. (2021). Development strategy of sago local food agroindustry using Analytical Hierarchy Process method. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 7(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.18196/agraris.v7i1.9378
Trisia, M. A., Tachikawa, M., & Ehara, H. (2021). The role of the sago supply chain for rural development in Indonesia: A review and perspective. Reviews in Agricultural Science, 9, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.9.0_143
Venkatesh, G. (2022). Circular bio-economy—Paradigm for the future: Systematic review of scientific journal publications from 2015 to 2021. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2, 231–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00084-3
Wulanningtyas, H. S., Soplanit, A., Baliadi, Y., & Sulaeman, Y. (2025). Peatlands development potency for sago cultivation in Papua. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1463, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1463/1/012006
Template
