Pendekatan Kuantitatif Dalam Penelitian Manajemen Strategik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v6i6.9333Keywords:
manajemen strategik, data, endogeneitas, abduksiAbstract
Penelitian empiris kuantitatif di bidang manajemen strategik terus berkembang. Pendekatannya adalah menyoroti tren penelitian dan tidak memberikan tinjauan komprehensif atas literatur. Sebagian besar bagian ini bersifat prospektif dan membahas cara-cara penelitian kuantitatif memiliki potensi untuk berkembang lebih lanjut. Alih-alih fokus pada metode estimasi spesifik dan pendekatan statistik, tetapi lebih memperhatikan isu-isu yang lebih luas terkait desain penelitian. Pembahasan ini didasarkan pada dua prinsip. Pertama, tujuan akhir dari penelitian manajemen strategik adalah untuk memberikan informasi yang berguna bagi tindakan para pengambil keputusan, termasuk manajer, pemilik, dan pembuat kebijakan. Kedua, keunggulan sebagai akademisi, dibandingkan dengan pihak lain yang ingin memberikan informasi kepada para pengambil keputusan, berasal dari wawasan yang diperoleh melalui penelitian berbasis bukti yang ketat.
Kata kunci: manajemen strategik, data, endogeneitas, abduksi
References
Alcácer, J., Chung, W., Hawk, A., & Pacheco-de-Almeida, G. (2018). Applying random coefficient models to strategy research: Identifying and exploring firm heterogeneous effects. Strategy Science, 3(3), 533–553.
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3–30.
Bettis, R. A., Helfat, C. E., & Shaver, J. M. (2016). The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2193–2203.
Bikard, M. (2020). Idea twins: Simultaneous discoveries as a research tool. Strategic Management Journal, 41(8), 1528–1543.
Certo, S. T., Withers, M. C., & Semadeni, M. (2017). A tale of two effects: Using longitudinal data to compare within and between firm effects. Strategic Management Journal, 38(7), 1536–1556.
Chai, S., & Freeman, R. B. (2019). Temporary colocation and collaborative discovery: Who confers at conferences. Strategic Management Journal, 40(13), 2138–2164.
Chatterji, A. K., Findley, M., Jensen, N. M., Meier, S., & Nielson, D. (2016). Field experiments in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1), 116–132.
Choudhury, P., Allen, R., & Endres, M. G. (2020). Machine learning for pattern discovery in management research. Harvard Business School Working Paper.
Gangl, M. (2010). Causal inference in sociological research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 21–47.
Guadalupe, M., Li, L., & Wulf, J. (2014). Who lives in the C-suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management. Management Science, 60(4), 824–844.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1346–1352.
Helfat, C. (2007). Stylized facts, empirical research, and theory development in management. Strategic Organization, 5(2), 185–192.
Knott, A. M. (2008). R&D returns causality: Absorptive capacity or organizational IQ? Management Science, 54(12), 2054–2067.
Oldroyd, J. B., Morris, S. S., & Dotson, J. P. (2019). Principles or templates? The antecedents and performance effects of cross-border knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 40(13), 2191–2213.
Oxley, J. E., Rivkin, J. W., & Ryall, M. D. (2010). The strategy research initiative: Recognizing and encouraging high-quality research in strategy. Strategic Organization, 8(4), 377–386.
Pillai, S. D., Goldfarb, B., & Kirsh, D. A. (2020). The origins of firm strategy: Learning by economic experimentation and strategic pivots in the early automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, 41(3), 369–399.
Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42.
Samii, C. (2016). Causal empiricism in quantitative research. Journal of Politics, 78(3), 941–955.
Shaver, J. M. (2019). Interpreting interactions in linear fixed effect regression models: When fixed effect estimates are no longer within effects. Strategy Science, 4(1), 25–40.
Shaver, J. M. (2020). Causal identification through a cumulative body of research in the study of strategy and organizations. Journal of Management, 46(7), 1244–1256.
Template
