Transmisi Preferensi Desain Interior Lintas Generasi Orang Tua dan Anak

Authors

  • Alviona Vernica Shaf Akhdina Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Kampus ITS Sukolilo
  • Susy Budi Astuti Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Kampus ITS Sukolilo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/dcdy0t89

Keywords:

Identitas Tempat, Preferensi Tempat Tinggal, Generasi X dan Z, Desain Interior, Penularan Antargenerasi

Abstract

Preferensi terhadap hunian dipengaruhi oleh dimensi psikologis dan sosiokultural yang membentuk identitas individu terhadap tempat tinggalnya. Identitas individu tersebut menghasilkan dimensi place identity yang berkembang bersama keterikatan emosional terhadap tempat (place attachment) serta persepsi individu terhadap waktu (sense of time). Identitas tersebut dapat terkonstruksi melalui interaksi hubungan orang tua (Generasi X) dan anak (Generasi Z). Dengan dipengaruhi latar belakang historis dan ekonomi yang berbeda, terdapat perbedaan pemaknaan hunian antara Generasi X dan Generasi Z. Penelitian ini bertujuan memahami bagaimana Generasi X dan Z memaknai place identity dalam kaitannya dengan preferensi hunian. Untuk itu, penelitian ini mengumpulkan data mengenai place identity terhadap preferensi hunian menggunakan metode kualitatif pada subsampel tiga keluarga yang masing-masing terdiri dari satu Generasi X (orang tua) dan satu Generasi Z (anak). Data dikumpulkan melalui Focus Group Discussion (FGD) dan in depth interview dalam kurun waktu 1 Maret 2026 hingga 8 Maret 2026, serta mencakup berbagai variabel yang merepresentasikan dimensi Meaning, Physical Setting, Activity, dan preferensi hunian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan mendasar dalam pemaknaan hunian: Generasi X lebih menekankan aspek historis dan stabilitas emosional, sementara Generasi Z cenderung lebih dinamis, minimalis, serta memprioritaskan fleksibilitas dan aksesibilitas. Penelitian ini berkontribusi terhadap pemahaman desain interior berbasis generasi sekaligus menawarkan pendekatan desain yang kontekstual dan adaptif terhadap pergeseran nilai serta identitas antar-generasi.

References

Aguspriyanti, C. D., Benny, B., Christine, V., Fernando, D., & Tan, A. (2023). Between Architecture, Story, and Place Identity: A Narrative Approach for Creative Placemaking in Museum Design. Jurnal Arsitektur TERRACOTTA, 5(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.26760/terracotta.v5i1.9183

Alimah, M. K., Anggraini, S. P., & Khairunnisa, A. N. (2026). Comparative Study of the Transformation of JNM Bloc Yogyakarta and Blok M Jakarta Through a Creative Placemaking Approach. Lakar: Jurnal Arsitektur, 9(1), 65–84. https://newjournal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/lakar/article/view/2004

Dwi Satria, W., Tika Elsandi, R., & Yuningsih, Y. (2023). Factors in Selecting Rental Housing Based on ITERA Student Preferences. International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 7(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.32734/ijau.v7i1.11685

Malpas, J. (1999). Place and Experience: A philosophical topography. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10903770123141

Marlina, A., Farkhan, A., Sulasyono, R. R., Setyadji, K. H., & Prayoga, R. (2024). Tangible and Intangible Territories in Javanese Settlements: Baluwarti Surakarta Sunanate Palace in Indonesia. ISVS E-Journal, 11(01), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.61275/isvsej-2024-11-01-06

Nur’izzah, N., Ernawati, J., & Santosa, H. (2026). The Effect of Streetscape Characteristics on the Distinctiveness of Place Identity in the Kayutangan Corridor According to Visitors’ Perceptions. RUAS, 23(2). https://ruas.ub.ac.id/index.php/ruas/article/view/8362

Peng, J., Strijker, D., & Wu, Q. (2020). Place Identity: How Far Have We Come in Exploring Its Meanings? Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294

Primanizar, R. (2024). the Presence of Critical Regionalism in Contemporary Mosques in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Architecture, 8(1), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v8i1.17848

Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8

Raagmaa, G. (2002). Regional identity in regional development and planning. European Planning Studies, 10(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120099263

Safira, C., & Hartanti, N. (2026). Peran Kegiatan Komersial dalam membentuk Sense of Place di Ruang Publik berdasarkan Persepsi Pengunjung (Studi Kasus: Taman Literasi, Blok M). SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 5, 1685–1698. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v5i2.5709

Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006

Suminar, L., Aliyah, I., Kusumastuti, & Pratama, K. F. (2023). A Review of Adaptive Reuse of Urban Heritage: Relevant Lesson from Semarang Old Town, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1186(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1186/1/012009

Wulandari, L. D., Asikin, D., & Pratiwi, E. I. (2023). Local characters of Chinese ethnic settlements in Chinatown area of Malang and Kembang Jepun area of Surabaya. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1263(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1263/1/012010

Yılmaz, C. D., Lajunen, T., & Sullman, M. J. M. (2023). Trust in relationships: a preliminary investigation of the influence of parental divorce, breakup experiences, adult attachment style, and close relationship beliefs on dyadic trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260480

Yuen, B. (2005). Searching for place identity in Singapore. Habitat International, 29(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2003.07.002

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Transmisi Preferensi Desain Interior Lintas Generasi Orang Tua dan Anak. (2026). Community Engagement and Emergence Journal (CEEJ), 7(6), 5361-5372. https://doi.org/10.37385/dcdy0t89