Development of an AI-Based Smart Sustainability Management Accounting Model to Support Strategic Decisions and ESG Performance

Authors

  • Ericke Fridatien Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v7i6.11609

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Sustainability Management Accounting, Smart Sustainability Management Accounting, ESG Performance, Strategic Decision Making, SEM-PLS.

Abstract

The rapid adoption of omnichannel retail has transformed customer shopping behavior by integrating digital and physical touchpoints into a unified shopping journey. While previous studies have primarily employed quantitative approaches to examine the effects of omnichannel capabilities on customer outcomes, limited attention has been given to understanding customers' lived experiences across multiple touchpoints. This study explores the omnichannel experiences of young consumers at AZKO retail stores in Jakarta using a qualitative case study approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 26 participants selected through purposive sampling and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. The findings identified three major themes shaping omnichannel customer experience: Inventory Visibility, Channel Integration, and Human Interaction. These themes were further conceptualized into three proposed constructs: Information Transparency, Cross-Channel Integration, and Service Support, which together form a customer-centered conceptual model of omnichannel experience. The findings indicate that customers evaluate omnichannel retail holistically, emphasizing accurate inventory information, seamless transitions between online and offline channels, and knowledgeable frontline employees as complementary dimensions of a satisfying shopping experience. This study contributes to omnichannel retail literature by developing an empirically grounded conceptual framework that extends existing quantitative research and provides practical guidance for retailers seeking to improve omnichannel integration and customer experience.

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company.

Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(2), 329–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2013-1237

Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116.

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

International Federation of Accountants. (2023). The role of professional accountants in sustainability reporting. IFAC.

International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023). IFRS S1: General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. IFRS Foundation.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The execution premium: Linking strategy to operations for competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2017). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practice. Routledge.

Schaltegger, S., & Zvezdov, D. (2015). Gatekeepers of sustainability information: Exploring the roles of accountants. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(3), 333–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-10-2013-0083

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

World Economic Forum. (2024). Global risks report 2024 (19th ed.). World Economic Forum.

Yoon, B., Lee, J., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635

Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence and corporate sustainability: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(8), 6421. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086421

Agarwal, R., Gao, G., DesRoches, C., & Jha, A. K. (2010). Research commentary—The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 796–809.

Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Next-generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii–ix.

George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027.

OECD. (2024). OECD AI principles. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI universal standards 2021. Global Reporting Initiative.

European Commission. (2023). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). European Commission.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06

How to Cite

Development of an AI-Based Smart Sustainability Management Accounting Model to Support Strategic Decisions and ESG Performance. (2026). Community Engagement and Emergence Journal (CEEJ), 7(6), 6077-6089. https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v7i6.11609