Iconic Attributes of Ergo-Iconic Value: A Synthesis for Sustainable Product Excellence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/ys8hm533Keywords:
Ergo-Iconic Value, Iconic Attributes, Product Design, Competitive Advantage, User Experience, Cultural Resonance Capital, Emotional Design, Value-Based MarketingAbstract
Despite extensive research on ergonomics, aesthetics, and user experience, limited studies have integrated these perspectives to explain how iconic value is formed and sustained in the marketplace. This study aims to conceptualize the iconic attributes that constitute ergo-iconic value and to develop a novel theoretical framework through a systematic synthesis of literature indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Drawing on theories of ergonomics, emotional design, aesthetics, value-based marketing, cultural branding, and the digital platform economy, the study constructs a comprehensive conceptual model of ergo-iconic value. The findings define ergo-iconic value as a superior value proposition derived from three dimensions of comfort: functional comfort, usability comfort, and pleasure comfort. Furthermore, three core iconic attributes are identified: symbolic and visual appeal, emotional connection and cultural identity, and economic activation and practical value. These attributes operate across visceral, behavioral, and reflective levels of user experience, consistent with Norman’s emotional design framework. The study further proposes the concept of Cultural Resonance Capital to explain why products, services, or digital content with comparable ergonomic and aesthetic qualities may exhibit different levels of market acceptance, consumer attachment, and longevity. As a conceptual study, the proposed framework requires empirical validation across diverse contexts. Nevertheless, it offers theoretical and practical insights for designers, marketers, and SMEs seeking to create sustainable value through the integration of functional performance, emotional engagement, and cultural resonance in the Industry 5.0 era.
References
Alves, J., Lima, T. M., & Gaspar, P. D. (2023). Is Industry 5.0 a Human-Centred Approach? A Systematic Review. In Processes (Vol. 11, Issue 1, p. 193). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010193
Andriyansah, & Fatimah, F. (2020a). Developing the Concept of E-Customer Relationship Management Model to Improve Marketing Performance. International Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E-Government, 22–26. https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3409929
Andriyansah, & Fatimah, F. (2020b). Developing the Concept of E-Customer Relationship Management Model to Improve Marketing Performance. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409929.3414746
Andriyansah, Ginting, G., & Rahim, A. R. (2023). Developing the competitive advantage of small and medium enterprises through an ergoiconic value approach in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 17(2), 436–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v17i2.1196
Arruda Filho, E. J. M., & Barcelos, A. de A. (2021). Negative Online Word-of-Mouth: Consumers’ Retaliation in the Digital World. Journal of Global Marketing, 34(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2020.1775919
Bhandari, U., Chang, K., & Neben, T. (2019). Understanding the impact of perceived visual aesthetics on user evaluations: An emotional perspective. Information & Management, 56(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.07.003
Bhavsar, K. V, Singh, P., Shony, A., & Sureshchandra, M. (2024). Human ergonomics in healthcare system: applications and challenges. In Advances in Drug Delivery Systems for Healthcare (pp. 15–28). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-5613-8ch15
Candi, M., Jae, H., Makarem, S., & Mohan, M. (2017). Consumer responses to functional, aesthetic and symbolic product design in online reviews. Journal of Business Research, 81, 31–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.006
Chen, Y.-T., & Lee, Y.-H. (2024). Using the ALESSI Evaluation Model to Explore the Shape Structure of Parametric Design Products BT - Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research (T. Tsai, K. Chen, T. Yamanaka, S. Koyama, S. Schütte, & A. Mohd Lokman (eds.); pp. 39–50). Springer Nature Singapore.
Creusen, M. E. H., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (n.d.). The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice. 1–32.
Creusen, M. E. H., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00103.x
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2004). Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25(6), 547–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001
Curth, M., Dantas, Í., Pedragosa, V., & Ferreira, A. C. D. (2026). Between pragmatism and symbolism: the sports footwear choices of lower-middle-class Generation Z in Brazil and Portugal. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-08-2025-0402
Danesi, M. (2013). Semiotizing a product into a brand. Social Semiotics, 23(4), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2013.799003
Dell’era, C. (2010). Art for Business: Creating Competitive Advantage through Cultural Projects. Industry and Innovation, 17(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710903573844
Fabricant, R. (2005). Incorporating guidance and rewards into a handheld-device user experience. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85054298798&partnerID=40&md5=b5e0ec57dfcea6bd1b571f45364a61c6
Fan, J. E., Hutchinson, J. B., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2016). When past is present: Substitutions of long-term memory for sensory evidence in perceptual judgments. Journal of Vision, 16(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1167/16.8.1
Furrer, O., Yu Kerguignas, J., & Landry, M. (2021). Customer captivity, negative word of mouth and well-being: a mixed-methods study. Journal of Services Marketing, 35(6), 755–773. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-07-2020-0311
Hong, S. W., Han, S. H., & Kim, K.-J. (2008). Optimal balancing of multiple affective satisfaction dimensions: A case study on mobile phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(3), 272–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.09.002
Hossny, M. (2022). Factors Affecting Customers Purchase Decision in Fast Food Restaurants: The Mediating Role of Dissatisfaction and Negative Word of Mouth. Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality, 9(1), 180–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21608/jaauth.2022.114244.1284
Hu, H., Liu, Y., Lu, W. F., & Guo, X. (2022). A quantitative aesthetic measurement method for product appearance design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 53, 101644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101644
Jacob-Dazarola, R., Ortíz Nicolás, J. C., & Cárdenas Bayona, L. (2016). 5 - Behavioral Measures of Emotion (H. L. B. T.-E. M. Meiselman (ed.); pp. 101–124). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100508-8.00005-9
Järvelin, S. (2010). Ergonomics and cleanroom work. VTT Symposium (Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus), 266, 16–23. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-80053298535&partnerID=40&md5=d647c39a8345209605756c09d6a81c4b
Lauriault, T. P., & Lindgaard, G. (2006). Scented Cybercartography: Exploring Possibilities. Cartographica, 41(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.3138/W432-713U-3621-04N3
Lee, T.-P. (2007). Shaping product form based on consumers’ cognition. Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, DS 42. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84862631881&partnerID=40&md5=ef503183bb1bf17e68aa6abf9a6d5302
Mackenzie Glander-Dolo, S. (2018). Organizational Ergonomics BT - Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (A. Farazmand (ed.); pp. 4318–4327). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_3030
Maurer, C. C., Bansal, P., & Crossan, M. M. (2011). Creating economic value through social values: Introducing a culturally informed resource-based view. Organization Science, 22(2), 432-448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0546
Nindiani, A., Suparno, O., Machfud, & Anggraeni, E. (2022). The challenge of bamboo craft industry in the VUCA era. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1063, No. 1, 012046. https://iopscience.iop.org/issue/1755-1315/1063/1
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design. Perché amiamo (o odiamo) gli oggetti della vita quotidiana. (Apogeo Edi). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=8U6YDRqUkfcC&lpg=PA1&ots=E04qDSoNiG&dq=Emotional design%3A Why we love (or hate) everyday things&lr&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
Scully, A., & Uniyal, A. (2017). Icons And Archetypes Moving Forward. DS 88: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design, Building Community: Design Education for a Sustainable Future Education (E&PDE17), 568–573.
Strasser, H. (2009). Principles, Methods and Examples of Ergonomics Research and Work Design BT - Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics (C. M. Schlick (ed.); pp. 363–381). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Tractinsky, N. (2004). Tools over solutions? comments on Interacting with Computers special issue on affective computing . Interacting with Computers, 16(4), 751–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2004.06.003
Trento, C. R., Stüker, S., Pereira, G. M., Borchardt, M., & Viegas, C. V. (2011). Strategic benchmarking of service pricing based on the value added. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 2(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590811111129490
Wesnina, W., Prabawati, M., & Noerharyono, M. (2025). Integrating traditional and contemporary in digital techniques: the analysis of Indonesian batik motifs evolution. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2474845. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2474845
Yong, E. L. (2020). Understanding Cultural Determinants of Scientific-Knowledge Development: Empirical Conceptualization from a Cross-Country Investigation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(4), 1646–1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00626-4
